Injured in San Jose? Free case review, 24/7. ✆ (408) 677-2785 Submit My Claim →
San Jose Uber and Lyft Accident Attorneys

San Jose Uber and Lyft accident lawyer.
The app period decides everything.

Rideshare crashes are not ordinary car accidents. California regulates Uber and Lyft as Transportation Network Companies, and the insurance that applies depends entirely on what the driver's app was doing at the moment of impact. The gap between the highest and lowest coverage tier is enormous, and the only proof of which tier applies sits on servers the companies control. And as of January 1, 2026, one of those coverage layers was cut by roughly 94 percent.

FREE
Case Review
NO FEE
Unless We Win
$0
Upfront Cost
24/7
Available
California law on your side

Your San Jose Uber and Lyft accident rights under California law

  • Three app periods, three different coverage outcomes — Cal. Pub. Util. Code § 5433 — Period 1 is app on with no ride accepted, and it carries limited contingent liability coverage. Period 2 begins when a ride is accepted and the driver is en route. Period 3 runs from passenger pickup to drop-off. Periods 2 and 3 carry $1 million in primary liability coverage. Which period applied at impact is the single most valuable fact in the case.
  • SB 371 cut rideshare uninsured motorist coverage on January 1, 2026 — Until the end of 2025, California required TNCs to carry $1 million in uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage while a passenger was in the vehicle. Senate Bill 371 reduced that requirement to $60,000 per person and $300,000 per incident. Liability coverage when the rideshare driver is at fault remains at $1 million. But if an uninsured third party causes the crash, the available pool is now a fraction of what it was, which makes your own UM coverage far more important than it used to be.
  • The proof lives in app data, and the companies do not volunteer it — Timestamps for going online, accepting the ride, arriving at pickup and completing the trip are the only reliable evidence of period status. Uber and Lyft maintain these records and produce them in litigation, but not to third parties on request. A written preservation demand sent in the first days is what protects that data from a retention schedule.
  • Proposition 22 does not eliminate the coverage — California voters classified app-based drivers as independent contractors, which limits ordinary vicarious liability arguments against the companies. It does not remove the statutory insurance obligation. The Public Utilities Code coverage requirements are minimums, not caps, and they apply regardless of the driver's employment classification.
  • Passengers are almost never at fault — A rideshare passenger has no control over the vehicle and no realistic comparative fault exposure. The dispute in a passenger case is not whether you can recover but from which policy — the rideshare driver's, the other driver's, the TNC layer, or your own UM coverage.
  • Two years to file — Cal. CCP § 335.1 — The ordinary California personal injury deadline applies. But app data retention, and the arbitration terms buried in the rider agreement you accepted when you installed the app, both need to be addressed long before that.
✆ Call Now — Free Consultation

Why San Jose Uber and Lyft accident cases require specialized handling

A standard collision has one or two insurers. A rideshare collision can have five: the rideshare driver's personal policy, the TNC's commercial policy, the other driver's policy, the other driver's employer if commercial, and your own UM coverage. Each will point at the others. Sorting the order of payment is the case, and it is not something an adjuster will do in your favor unaided.

The San Jose rideshare evidence on a retention clock

Your own trip receipt is the single best piece of evidence a passenger holds, and most people never think to screenshot it. It shows the driver, the vehicle, the route and the timestamps. Save it, along with the in-app trip detail screen, before the account history is archived. Then the preservation demand goes out for the driver-side data: GPS trace, app status log, and any internal incident reporting.

The three Uber and Lyft insurance periods in California

Everything in a rideshare case runs through this framework, so it is worth being precise about it.

Period 1 — app on, no ride accepted

The driver is logged in and waiting. Coverage here is contingent and limited, generally mirroring standard auto liability limits rather than the commercial layer. Personal auto policies frequently exclude losses occurring while the driver is logged into a rideshare platform, which is precisely the coverage gap this tier was created to fill. It is also the tier where the driver's own policy is most likely to deny.

Period 2 — ride accepted, driver en route

The moment a driver accepts a request, the commercial layer engages. Public Utilities Code § 5433 requires $1 million in primary liability coverage from acceptance until the trip completes. A crash on the way to pick you up falls here.

Period 3 — passenger in the vehicle

From pickup to drop-off, the same $1 million primary liability requirement applies. If the rideshare driver caused the crash, this is the policy that responds, and it is substantial.

What SB 371 changed for San Jose rideshare passengers in 2026

This is the development most pages have not caught up with, and it matters enormously.

Historically, California required TNCs to carry $1 million in uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage while a passenger was in the car. That layer existed for a specific and common scenario: you are riding in an Uber, and someone else — an uninsured driver, or a hit and run driver — causes the crash. The rideshare driver did nothing wrong, so the $1 million liability policy does not respond. The UM layer did.

Senate Bill 371 took effect January 1, 2026 and reduced that UM/UIM requirement to $60,000 per person and $300,000 per incident. Liability coverage for an at-fault rideshare driver is unchanged at $1 million. But in the uninsured-third-party scenario, the ceiling dropped by roughly 94 percent. A single hospital admission can exceed $60,000.

The practical consequence for anyone in San Jose who rides frequently: your own uninsured motorist coverage now carries far more weight than it did last year. It stacks behind the reduced TNC layer, and it is inexpensive to increase. This is worth checking on your own policy today rather than after a crash.

What we prove in a San Jose Uber and Lyft accident case

Liability is often straightforward. Coverage is not. The work is establishing, with records rather than testimony, exactly what the app was doing at impact — because a driver who claims to have gone online moments earlier, or a trip that had technically ended when the passenger was still in the vehicle, moves the case between coverage tiers worth very different amounts.

That is why the preservation demand goes out first. GPS trace, app status log, trip acceptance and completion timestamps, driver history, and any internal incident report. These are produced through subpoena in litigation, but only if they still exist.

What to do after a San Jose Uber or Lyft accident

Screenshot the trip in the app before you do anything else — driver name, vehicle, plate, route and timestamps. Report the incident through the app so a record is created on the company's side. Call 911 and make sure the report notes the rideshare status. Photograph the vehicles and the scene. Get medical attention the same day. Do not accept a quick settlement offered through the app before anyone has evaluated your injuries or determined which coverage tier applies, and do not give a recorded statement to any of the several insurers who will call.

Our process

What happens after you call a San Jose Uber and Lyft accident lawyer

No confusion. No pressure. Here is exactly what to expect when you contact us.

1

Free Uber and Lyft accident case review

We review your trip data, the app period and every available policy at no cost, and identify which coverage actually responds.

2

We take over your Uber and Lyft accident claim

We send preservation demands to the TNC for GPS and app status data, and handle all five potential insurers.

3

We negotiate your Uber and Lyft accident settlement

We know what rideshare cases in Santa Clara County are worth, and we stack the TNC layer against your own UM coverage.

4

You get your Uber and Lyft accident settlement

Our fee comes from your recovery only — never out of pocket. If we do not win, you owe us nothing.

Common questions

Uber and Lyft accident questions — answered by San Jose attorneys

It depends entirely on the app period. With the app on but no ride accepted, coverage is contingent and limited. From the moment a ride is accepted through drop-off, Public Utilities Code § 5433 requires $1 million in primary liability coverage. Uninsured motorist coverage is a separate layer and was reduced by SB 371 effective January 1, 2026 to $60,000 per person and $300,000 per incident, down from $1 million. Establishing the period is therefore the first and most valuable step in the case.
Senate Bill 371 took effect January 1, 2026 and cut the uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage TNCs must carry while a passenger is in the vehicle from $1 million to $60,000 per person and $300,000 per incident. Liability coverage when the rideshare driver is at fault is unchanged at $1 million. The reduction matters in the common scenario where an uninsured third party causes the crash — the available pool is now a fraction of what it was, which makes your own uninsured motorist coverage considerably more important.
Direct claims against the companies are constrained. California voters classified app-based drivers as independent contractors, which limits ordinary vicarious liability theories. What that classification does not do is eliminate the statutory insurance requirements under the Public Utilities Code, which apply regardless of employment status. In most cases the practical recovery runs through the applicable insurance layers rather than through a direct corporate claim, though the statutory limits are floors rather than ceilings on liability.
It depends on the period and on who was at fault. If a third party caused the crash while you were in Period 2 or 3, their liability policy responds first, then the applicable uninsured or underinsured layers. If you were in Period 1, your personal auto policy may exclude the loss entirely because you were logged into the platform — a gap many drivers do not discover until they need the coverage. Rideshare endorsements on personal policies exist to close it and are worth reviewing before a crash rather than after.
App data, and it is on a retention schedule. The timestamps showing when the driver went online, accepted the ride, arrived at pickup and completed the trip determine which coverage tier applies, and the difference between tiers is worth hundreds of thousands of dollars. The companies hold this data and produce it in litigation but not on informal request. A written preservation demand in the first days after the crash is what keeps it available. Your own in-app trip receipt is the best evidence you personally control — screenshot it immediately.

Injured in an Uber or Lyft in San Jose? The app data is on a clock.

Which period you were in decides your coverage. Free consultation, no fee unless we win.

✆ (408) 677-2785 — Free Call

Uber and Lyft accident legal authorities and official sources

The statutes, agencies and public resources referenced on this page. Verify any deadline against the primary source.

Free case review

No cost, no obligation. Choose how you'd like to start.

✆ Call (408) 677-2785 ✉ Submit My Case Online